David Hanley

Review this text carefully and evaluate its clarity, tone, and overall professionalism. Use explicit criteria to assess whether the writing demonstrates a professional style, considering clarity of expression, appropriate tone, and structural coherence. Identify measurable indicators of professionalism, such as consistency, grammar accuracy, and effective communication. If it does not meet these standards, rewrite the text to reflect a polished, professional quality.

Have the LLM perform a deep, multi-dimensional review of its previous output. Define clear evaluation criteria emphasizing accuracy and relevance, along with additional quality factors. Implement a weighted scoring system that prioritizes these criteria according to their impact. Provide a tiered evaluation structure with explicit weighting and rationale to determine if and how the output could be improved.

Propose a good subscription plan idea for an AI chatbot-like service. Compare potential pricing models with pros and cons for each. Outline a decision flow to balance affordability and feature richness, emphasizing a one-size-fits-all simplicity to reduce subscription fatigue. Detail criteria for segmenting users based on behaviors to minimize churn, without complicating the plan. Include steps to validate plan appeal via behavioral segmentation analysis, mapping a flow that balances simplicity against user diversity while addressing key subscription fatigue factors that reduce retention.

Explain multiple reasons why someone with an autistic child might dislike RFK Jr., listing distinct concerns that specifically link him to autism controversies. Enumerate his specific claims affecting autism perceptions and map how these claims influence public trust on autism-related issues such as vaccines and therapies. Include which public statements and caregiver experiences most intensify negative perceptions toward him in this context.

Outline step-by-step procedures for creating an anonymous burner Instagram account. Develop a comprehensive pre-creation checklist to verify anonymity, including validating that IP addresses and metadata leaks are prevented before account setup.

Present a ranked list of the hardest statements made by Jesus for people to accept. For each statement, explain why it is challenging, comparing contrasting interpretations of its difficulty. Highlight historical and cultural contexts influencing acceptance. Summarize criteria defining what makes a statement 'hardest' to accept, including psychological impact and emotional versus intellectual resistance. Incorporate theological and secular frameworks systematically, outlining factors influencing acceptance difficulty. Provide a checklist of cultural, temporal, and doctrinal barriers and design criteria measuring emotional and cognitive resistance. Map acceptance trends across demographics and psychographic attributes, integrating ethical lenses and providing a layered evaluation of rejection triggers and resistance types.

Create a PRD document using the following context. Outline the PRD structure, including key sections and components. Resolve conflicts in reverse chronological order. List any conflicts or unresolved problems after writing the initial PRD. Then analyze the final PRD to resolve remaining conflicts by making the best argument. Rewrite the PRD incorporating these resolutions. Establish clear, measurable criteria for completeness and clarity for each PRD section and component to evaluate the document's quality. [context pasted here]

Provide actionable, step-by-step strategies to increase motivation and stop procrastinating when starting work. Break the guidance into modular checklists organized by motivation phases and effort levels. Include adaptive criteria to customize these checklists based on different task types, ensuring practical methods to overcome common emotional and cognitive blocks that impede initial engagement.

You are an expert SEO strategist. I will give you an initial user prompt. Your task is to generate optimized SEO elements for a webpage showcasing content based on this prompt. Provide the following outputs in order: Slug – a short, lowercase, hyphen-separated URL path (no stop words, 3–6 words, under 60 characters). Title Tag (≤ 60 characters) – include the main keyword naturally. Meta Description (≤ 160 characters) – concise, keyword-rich, and enticing. Keyword List (10–15 terms) – include primary and long-tail variations people might search. Suggested H1 and H2 Headings – structured for readability and keyword coverage. Then, provide a checklist verifying SEO element relevance, alignment with user intent, and search relevance, including criteria to assess balance and quality. Ensure all SEO elements align with user intent and search relevance. Here is the initial prompt: [INSERT PROMPT]

Analyze and identify the best Pontiac ever, focusing on universally agreed-upon best-looking models throughout the brand's full history. Evaluate multiple criteria such as design, performance, popularity, historical significance, and era impact. Compare top Pontiac models with pros and cons for each, summarizing common aesthetic qualities that define the best-looking vehicles. Provide a ranked list reflecting broad consensus and iconic status in Pontiac's history.

Review the provided prompt and documents to identify and summarize all contradictions. For each contradiction, include enough context so the creator can understand the issue. Present the contradictions as a list of clear questions for the creator to answer, ensuring the contradictions are explicitly flagged with supporting context.

Summarize this conversation in-depth without skipping any details. Organize the summary by thematic sections with clear headings, clustering related topics together. Within each section, present the information in reverse chronological order, as this order reflects importance when handling conflicts. Provide ample context for each topic to prevent any confusion. Context will be pasted below the prompt.

Review everything we've discussed in this chain in reverse chronological order of importance. Build a new PRD that is extremely comprehensive. Outline the new PRD with clear section headings and subheadings. For each product requirement section, define explicit acceptance criteria and incorporate a decision criteria checklist. Develop a risk assessment matrix for each product requirement section.

Generate a concise five-sentence pitch starting with 'Does this happen to you?' The pitch should be designed to resonate with as broad an audience as possible. Only produce the prompt; context will always be appended separately. Focus on clarity and relatability to maximize audience engagement without adding explicit measurement criteria.

Using the resume pasted at the bottom of this prompt, generate a clear, step-by-step outline to perform a web search on ChatGPT-5 for jobs directly linked to the resume and most closely matching it. Summarize best practices for creating job search queries using key resume sections. Define quality criteria to systematically evaluate the relevance of search results. Include guidelines to isolate actionable job attributes from the resume content. Provide a checklist of query elements derived from the resume's main sections. Create a decision flow to prioritize job results by relevance and application fit. Apply a scoring rubric that weights job matching components based on the pasted resume data. Include risk checks to filter outdated or irrelevant listings not aligned with the resume context.

List products that can be built by chaining about 30 prompts together, saving output artifacts in a database for later retrieval and further prompting. For each product, provide a brief functional description, explain key benefits and potential challenges, and illustrate the layered workflow showing how prompt chaining enables interactions and user input points. Focus on diverse industry use cases assuming logical, end-to-end chaining primarily using web search and LLM capabilities (no external data beyond initial form inputs). Emphasize why these chained-prompt applications outperform standard single-prompt ChatGPT interactions and how the depth of a 30-step chain adds value or capability. Where relevant, outline evaluative criteria for innovation and market differentiation among these use cases.

Explain the benefits and drawbacks of upgrading to a new iPhone every year. Present criteria for evaluating when to purchase new electronics and compare reasons for yearly upgrades with the advantages of longer device usage. Summarize common financial and technological considerations and construct a detailed evaluation framework weighing the benefits against the costs of frequent device replacements. Include an explanation of risk categories related to frequently replacing electronic devices.