Generate a comprehensive PRD by structuring content, identifying and resolving conflicts, and defining clear quality criteria.
Final Prompt
Create a PRD document using the following context. Outline the PRD structure, including key sections and components. Resolve conflicts in reverse chronological order. List any conflicts or unresolved problems after writing the initial PRD. Then analyze the final PRD to resolve remaining conflicts by making the best argument. Rewrite the PRD incorporating these resolutions. Establish clear, measurable criteria for completeness and clarity for each PRD section and component to evaluate the document's quality. [context pasted here]
Copy this prompt and run it in your preferred AI
Sep 9, 2025
Auto-generated withGPT-4.1 Mini (No Web Access) — try this prompt in your own model with web search enabled for best results
System Result
Product Requirements Document (PRD)
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose
Define the purpose of the product or feature, including the problem it solves or the opportunity it captures.
1.2 Background and Context
Provide background information, market context, and any relevant history that informs the product development.
1.3 Scope
Specify what is in scope and out of scope for the product or feature.
1.4 Definitions and Acronyms
List and define any terms or acronyms used throughout the document.
2. Objectives and Success Criteria
2.1 Objectives
Clear and measurable goals that the product aims to achieve.
2.2 Success Metrics
Define quantifiable metrics to evaluate the success of the product (e.g., user adoption rate, performance benchmarks).
3. User Stories and Use Cases
3.1 User Personas
Identify key user personas or roles interacting with the product.
3.2 User Stories
List prioritized user stories detailing user needs and desired functionality.
3.3 Use Cases
Describe scenarios that explain how users will interact with the product.
4. Functional Requirements
Detailed feature descriptions and requirements necessary to meet the objectives.
- Each requirement should be uniquely identified.
- Specify inputs, behavior, and outputs.
5. Non-Functional Requirements
5.1 Performance
Define response times, throughput, and other relevant performance metrics.
5.2 Security
Detail security requirements and considerations.
5.3 Usability
Accessibility and usability expectations.
5.4 Reliability and Availability
SLA targets, uptime expectations.
6. Dependencies and Assumptions
List any dependencies (e.g., third-party services) and assumptions made during requirement gathering.
7. Constraints
Highlight technical, business, or regulatory constraints impacting the product.
8. Timeline and Milestones
Provide a high-level timeline, key milestones, and deliverable dates.
9. Risks and Mitigations
Identify potential risks and strategies to mitigate them.
10. Appendices
Additional supporting information such as wireframes, diagrams, or references.
Conflict Log
- No explicit conflicts were present within the provided context.
- Potential ambiguity resolved by adopting standard PRD best practices.
Final Analysis and Resolution
Since no conflicts or unresolved problems were identified after the initial PRD draft, the structure aligns with industry standards for clear and measurable specifications.
Completeness and Clarity Evaluation Criteria
Section | Completeness Criteria | Clarity Criteria |
---|---|---|
Introduction | Purpose, background, scope, and definitions are included. | Language is concise and understandable by all stakeholders. |
Objectives & Success | Goals are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, timely. | Metrics are clearly defined and quantifiable. |
User Stories & Use Cases | Personas and stories cover all primary user types and needs. | Stories and cases are easy to interpret and actionable. |
Functional Requirements | Requirements are detailed with identification and expected behavior. | Each requirement is unambiguous and testable. |
Non-Functional Req. | Performance, security, usability, reliability requirements detailed. | Requirements are specific and measurable where applicable. |
Dependencies & Assumptions | All external factors and assumptions explicitly stated. | Dependencies and assumptions are clearly described. |
Constraints | All known limitations are documented. | Constraints are clearly explained and justified. |
Timeline & Milestones | Key deliverables and dates are defined. | Timeline is realistic and clearly presented. |
Risks & Mitigations | Potential risks identified with mitigation plans. | Risk descriptions and mitigation strategies are clear and prioritized. |
This document aims to guide the development process with clarity and measurable targets, ensuring all stakeholders have a common understanding of the product requirements.
Original Prompt
create a prd document using the following context. resolve conflict in reverse chronological order. resolve un resolved conflicts by analyzing the final prd and making the best argument. so process is write prd, list conflicts or unresolved problems then rewrite prd with problems resolved [context pasted here]